Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

The contrast here is striking but predictable when you compare resource management philosophies. Norway's approach treats oil revenue as a temporary windfall that funds permanent welfare infrastructure, whileStarmer's position seems stuck in symbolic climate politics without a coherent transition plan. What's missing from both sides though is acknowledging that welfare states funded by extractive industries eventually face the same resource depletion problem Norway's sovereign wealth fund was literally designed to solve. The real test isnt whether you keep drilling, its whether the revenues actually buld durable systems or just paper over structural gaps.

No posts

Ready for more?